State v. Krogh

Appellant was convicted on an information charging him with the violation of the prohibition law, and, from the judgment rendered on the verdict, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, he appeals to this court. Only one of several errors assigned merits consideration.

No requests for instructions were made by either party, and the court at the close of the testimony proceeded to-instruct the jury orally. At the close of the instructions the court put this question to counsel for both parties:

“Are the attorneys on both sides satisfied with these instructions, and have either of…