Legal Opinion

Gomez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 1983No. 82-619Published

1Per curiam

The judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed upon a holding that: (1) the trial court committed no reversible error in denying defense motions for severance of defendants and counts because: (a) the defendants and counts were properly joined under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.150; (b) the failure of the co-defendant Orestes Delgado to contest the charges against him at trial did not require a severance of defendants as, in our view, this failure did not implicate the defendant Gomez in the crimes charged and therefore a severance of defendants was not required under Fla.R.Crim.P.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API