Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between Erlanger & Erlanger

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum. The Special Term order, affirmed by the Appellate Division, was a legitimate exercise of discretion. We take this occasion to resolve a conflict between the various departments of the Appellate Division on the question of jurisdiction to entertain challenges to the appearance of counsel in a matter on the grounds of alleged professional misconduct. (Compare Matter of Huie [Gottfried], 2 A D 2d 163 [3d Dept.] and Renault, Inc. v. Auto Imports, Ltd., 19 A D 2d 814 [1st Dept.] with Marco v. Sachs, 1 A D 2d 851 [2d Dept.].) While…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Erie County Water Authority v. Western New York Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moxham v. HanninganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Gordon v. ObiakorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Midwood Chayim Aruchim Dialysis Associates, Inc. v. Brooklyn Dialysis, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Waldman v. WaldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. De Cherro v. Civil Service Employees Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API