In Re the Arbitration Between Erlanger & Erlanger
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum. The Special Term order, affirmed by the Appellate Division, was a legitimate exercise of discretion. We take this occasion to resolve a conflict between the various departments of the Appellate Division on the question of jurisdiction to entertain challenges to the appearance of counsel in a matter on the grounds of alleged professional misconduct. (Compare Matter of Huie [Gottfried], 2 A D 2d 163 [3d Dept.] and Renault, Inc. v. Auto Imports, Ltd., 19 A D 2d 814 [1st Dept.] with Marco v. Sachs, 1 A D 2d 851 [2d Dept.].) While…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Erie County Water Authority v. Western New York Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moxham v. HanninganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Gordon v. ObiakorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Midwood Chayim Aruchim Dialysis Associates, Inc. v. Brooklyn Dialysis, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Waldman v. WaldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- De Cherro v. Civil Service Employees Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.