Legal Opinion

Haldane v. Town of Arcadia

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Oarroll District Oourt. AotioN to recover the value of services rendered by an attorney at law. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

RothbocK, JT.

I. Defendant assigns as error the action of the court in overruling, in two instances, objections made i. practice on appeal: arguecinotl waived. by defendant to plaintiff’s evidence. These auegea errors are not argued; counsel for defendant contenting himself with copying, in his printed argument, these assignments of errors, without a word of comment or argument. Errors assigned which are not argued are regarded as waived, and receive no attention from the court.

II. It is insisted that the district court erred in over*463ruling defendant’s motion for a new trial, on the ground that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woods v. SchmittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. UOP, Inc. v. Infilco Degremont, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API