Haldane v. Town of Arcadia
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Oarroll District Oourt. AotioN to recover the value of services rendered by an attorney at law. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
RothbocK, JT.
I. Defendant assigns as error the action of the court in overruling, in two instances, objections made i. practice on appeal: arguecinotl waived. by defendant to plaintiff’s evidence. These auegea errors are not argued; counsel for defendant contenting himself with copying, in his printed argument, these assignments of errors, without a word of comment or argument. Errors assigned which are not argued are regarded as waived, and receive no attention from the court.
II. It is insisted that the district court erred in over*463ruling defendant’s motion for a new trial, on the ground that…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Woods v. SchmittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- UOP, Inc. v. Infilco Degremont, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978