Maney v. . Greenwood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
After stating the case: The question in this case turned largely upon whether the defendants were partners in the transaction upon which the plaintiff declares. There was more than ample testimony to show that they were such partners. The defendant Joe M. Burlison signed the contract along with the plaintiff, and agreed to take and pay for the timber or logs which were merchantable, and which would saw out sound lumber. The codefendants, Greenwood and Blackstocks, if they were partners of Burlison would, of course, be responsible equally with him. The following are some of the facts tending…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Kornegay v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . SuggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Jenkins v. North Carolina Ore Dressing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.