Georgia Railroad & Banking Company v. Frazer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Whitman, Judge.
1. The appeal in this case is from the judgment on the verdict. However, all the matters enumerated as error, with three exceptions, were included in a motion for new trial, as amended. Said motion was passed on adversely to the appellant by the trial court.
Under the holding in Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (161 SE2d 281), the denial of a motion for new trial, as amended, unappealed from, becomes the law of the case as to matters passed on therein unless the denial of the motion is enumerated as error. See also Bryan v. State, 224 Ga. 389, 391 (1) (162 SE2d 349); Tiller v. State,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Tiller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Foskey v. KirklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Arkwright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sims v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Burnet v. BazemoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Gore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Garmany v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Burnet v. BazemoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.