Legal Opinion

United States v. McKetrick

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 7, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The United States may have judgment against both defendants 'for the sum of $1-,-265.48, as prayed for, with interest thereon from the 30th day of August, 1929.

I. The defendant McKetrick was the importer of 262 cases of medicinal bitters' which under the provisions _ of the Tariff Act of 1922, § 1, Schedule 8, par. 802 (19 USCA § 121, Schedule 8, par. 802),- were subject to a specific duty of $5 per proof gallon; consequently, the computation of' the duty involved merely a matter of multiplication of the number of gallons by the amount of $5 fixed as the duty.

McKetrick,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anglo-California Bank, Ltd. v. Secretary of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
  2. A. S. Rosenthal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. United States v. Judson Freight Forwarding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martino, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API