Legal Opinion · Dissent

White v. Schenectady Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1923Published

1DissentHinman, J.

Upon this motion for a nonsuit the plaintiff is entitled to the most favorable inferences to be drawn from the testimony. He was trailing a Scheneetady-Albany interurban trolley ear in a westerly direction on State street, Schenectady, N. Y., for a short distance and while turning in a southerly direction in the act of crossing the double tracks of the defendant from the northerly side of State street, into Martin street, in the rear of this west-bound interurban car which was standing on the northerly track discharging passengers at the lower and westerly crossing of said State and Martin…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wall v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API