Legal Opinion
Dilatush v. Highfill
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1944No. 12716PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
Statement.
This appeal is taken by Mrs. Lulu J. Dilatush to reverse a judgment of the District Court in Arkansas dismissing her action for want of jurisdiction. At the commencement of the action she was a citizen of Illinois and the defendants named in her complaint, who were served with process,. were her son, R. E. Dilatush, a citizen of Arkansas; H. Highfill, a citizen of Arkansas, and the Valley Credit Company, a Missouri corporation. The amount in controversy was in excess of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs, but the defendants Highfill and the corporation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sutton v. EnglishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Republic Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- B. J. Van Ingen & Co. v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- Financial Guaranty Insurance Company v. The City Of Fayetteville, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. BusbyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1950
- Reed v. RobilioDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1965
- Financial Guaranty Insurance v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991