Legal Opinion

Randolph Refining Corp. v. Shapiro

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 2, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In this bill in equity the plaintiff seeks damages and an injunction against the sale by the defendant of sedatives in the form of bottled capsules bearing the name “Somnicaps.” From a decree dismissing the bill the plaintiff appealed. The judge made a report of the material facts found by him. The evidence is not reported.

The plaintiff is a “one-man” corporation. One Mandorf is its president, treasurer, and sole employee. He conducts a small drug business from his home. The defendant is a New England salesman on commission for a New York pharmaceutical company. In 1951 the United States Food…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenney Manufacturing Co. v. Leader Filling Stations Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Broeg v. DuchaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Gould Engineering Co. v. GoebelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Datacomm Interface, Inc. v. Computerworld, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Skil Corp. v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. NutraMax Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. DataComm Interface v. COMPUTERWORLD, INC. ADELSONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API