Legal Opinion

People v. Duplissey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1968No. Calendar 49, Docket 51,622PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Haba, J.

Our grant(379 Mick 751) was “limited to whether the defendant and appel- lant should have been tried while handcuffed and whether the defendant and appellant should have been granted a separate trial.” Appellant and three others

Appellant and three otherswere tried on charges of armed robbery 1 and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. 2 In the first trial a mistrial was granted. The case was docketed for a new trial in tbe next term of tbe circuit court. When tbe case was called tbe codefendants, other than appellant, moved for a continuance on the ground' that a partial transcript ordered by…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. MalloryMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. People v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. MarkhamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API