People v. Duplissey
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Haba, J.
Our grant(379 Mick 751) was “limited to whether the defendant and appel- lant should have been tried while handcuffed and whether the defendant and appellant should have been granted a separate trial.” Appellant and three others
Appellant and three otherswere tried on charges of armed robbery 1 and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. 2 In the first trial a mistrial was granted. The case was docketed for a new trial in tbe next term of tbe circuit court. When tbe case was called tbe codefendants, other than appellant, moved for a continuance on the ground' that a partial transcript ordered by…
2Cited by23 opinions
- People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. MalloryMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- People v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MarkhamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.