Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
This review by certiorari questions the lawfulness of an award by the Industrial Commission of Arizona, finding that respondent had a compensable claim for silicosis. Specifically, three questions are presented: (1) was respondent exposed to silicon dioxide dust in his work for the petitioner employer; (2) was that work the proximate cause of respondent’s contraction of silicosis; (3) was respondent required to show that his silicosis disabled him from all work or just from returning to his former employment.
Our resolution of the third issue pertaining to total disability…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Matter of MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Savich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Phelps Dodge Corp., Morenci Br. v. Industrial Com'nArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Spears v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lewis v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980