Legal Opinion

Martucci v. Koppers Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 17, 1945No. 2273PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s action and for entry of a nonsuit. By agreement of counsel no formal motion papers have been filed.

The complaint sets forth that on or about February 14, 1939, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant, a corporation of the State of Delaware, plaintiff being employed in Jersey City, New Jersey. That plaintiff on the above date was treated by a servant of the defendant for a wound received by the plaintiff in his hand at the place of his employment. That as a result of the unskillful…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. BlanchardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  2. Gogolin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Andrew Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. Burns v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1950
  5. Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API