Martucci v. Koppers Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s action and for entry of a nonsuit. By agreement of counsel no formal motion papers have been filed.
The complaint sets forth that on or about February 14, 1939, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant, a corporation of the State of Delaware, plaintiff being employed in Jersey City, New Jersey. That plaintiff on the above date was treated by a servant of the defendant for a wound received by the plaintiff in his hand at the place of his employment. That as a result of the unskillful…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weinstein v. BlanchardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Gogolin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Andrew Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Burns v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1950
- Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.