Legal Opinion

In Re Conway

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 22, 1989No. 88-465PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Richard and Sandra Conway, applicants for an Act 250 permit to establish an automotive repair and used car business on Route 3 in Pittsford, Vermont, appeal an order of the Environmental Board remanding the matter to the District Commission for a hearing on the merits. The remand was or dered because actual notice of the permit process had not been given to a property owner across the road from the subject property, as required by Board procedure. We affirm.

The instructions included with the Act 250 application directed the Conways as follows:

Submit to the District Coordinator a list of all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. Town of Bennington v. Hanson-Walbridge Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. In Re McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. Committee to Save Bishop's House v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. In Re Green Peak EstatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. In Re Killington, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. Agency of Natural Resources v. GodnickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. In re Appeal of GriffinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API