Legal Opinion
DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-cv-14278
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 22, 2022No. 3:19-cv-14278Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF Civil Action No. 19-14278 (MAS)(LHG) AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court by way of a Motion to Quash (the “Motion to Quash”) filed by Plaintiff, Mercury Indemnity Company of America (“Mercury”), in response to a subpoena served by Defendant, Great Northern Insurance Company (“Great Northern”). [Docket Entry No. 42]. Mercury filed a Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Bayer AG v. Betachem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- In Re KozlovSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.