United States v. Riascos-Cuenu

Hovel Riascos-Cuenu appeals parts of the sentence the district court imposed after his plea of guilty to the crime of illegal re-entry. Riascos-Cuenu raises one primary issue. 2 He argues that the district court erred in imposing a condition of supervised release requiring him to cooperate in the probation officer’s collection of a DNA sample. Because we find that Riascos-Cuenu’s contention is controlled by our precedent, which holds that the issue is not ripe for our review, United States v. Carmichael, 343 F.3d 756 (5th Cir.2003), we dismiss this claim for lack of jurisdiction.

I

Riascos-Cuenu…