Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum & Spewak, P.C. v. Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge.
This is an unfortunate case in which a decree of divorce was entered by default against a client of a law firm. Believing that a claim would not be filed against it, the law firm did not report the event to its malpractice carrier, even after two letters of complaint from the client. Instead, the firm unsuccessfully attempted to vacate the decree and obtain a new trial. More than fifteen months after the default, upon receipt of notice from another attorney that he had been retained to pursue a malpractice claim, the law firm reported the claim to its carrier who denied coverage.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Weaver v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Insurance Placements, Inc. v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lexington Insurance Company v. St. Louis UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- General Acc. Ins. Co. of America v. TreftsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1987
3Cited by13 opinions
- Todd Ex Rel. Todd v. Missouri United School Insurance CouncilSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- American Special Risk Management Corp. v. CahowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Grissom v. First National Insurance AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- City of Brentwood, Mo. v. Northland Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005
- Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. v. LSI-Lowery Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.