Legal Opinion
Hood v. Slefkin
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided July 24, 1958No. Eq. Nos. 2680, 2681PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*181Roberts, J.
These two bills in equity were brought by several complainants among whom are the owners of land located on the shore of a pond formed by a dam owned by the respondents. Also parties complainant are the owners of land abutting upon the stream below that dam. Subsequent to the filing of the bill of complaint in the case of Donald R. Hood et al. v. Hyman L. Slefkin et al., by decree of the superior court additional individuals were added as parties complainant, and the attorney general of the state at the relation of such complainants and with his consent was also added as a party…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Drainage District No. 2 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Marshall Ice Co. v. LaPlantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Sal's Furniture Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
- Goodrich v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Russell Corp. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Bishop Eddie Long Ministries, Inc. v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Brimbau v. Ausdale Equipment Rental Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Dillard v. Bishop Eddie Long Ministries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Kem Manufacturing Corp. v. HowlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.