Legal Opinion
In re Estate of Palmer
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 17, 1992No. 91-0668PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLEN, Judge.
Appellants bring this appeal from the trial court’s order entered subsequent to this court’s mandate in Tarbox v. Palmer, 564 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA1990). We affirm.
The facts of this case are present in this court’s Tarbox opinion. Briefly, appellants are the residual beneficiaries under the will of Joseph Palmer. Mr. Palmer’s wife, Helen, was the primary beneficiary under his will, which established trusts of virtually all of the assets of his estate. Helen chose to take an elective share of her husband’s estate rather than that to which she was entitled under the will. This…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Price v. FLORIDA NAT. BANK OF MIAMIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Tarbox v. PalmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blackburn v. BoulisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Ace J. Blackburn, Jr., Chris A. Economou, Gus Morfidis and Joan S. Wagner, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Konstantinos Boulis, a/k/a Gus Boulis v. Efrosini Boulis a/k/a Frances BoulisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016