Legal Opinion

Harvard Mutual Agency, Inc. v. Pyrczak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified *1151on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendants’ application for a protective order should have been granted. It is well settled that, unless necessary to establish the right to an accounting, a plaintiff is not entitled to discovery of a defendant’s financial records in an accounting action until the right to an accounting has been demonstrated (A. Colish, Inc. v Abramson, 150 AD2d 210; Shandell v Katz, 95 AD2d 742; Papazoglou v Papazoglou, 69 AD2d 855). The financial documents sought to be produced are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elman v. ZiegfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Shandell v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Brugman v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. A. Colish, Inc. v. AbramsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Burns v. HayesNew York Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API