Harvard Mutual Agency, Inc. v. Pyrczak
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified *1151on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendants’ application for a protective order should have been granted. It is well settled that, unless necessary to establish the right to an accounting, a plaintiff is not entitled to discovery of a defendant’s financial records in an accounting action until the right to an accounting has been demonstrated (A. Colish, Inc. v Abramson, 150 AD2d 210; Shandell v Katz, 95 AD2d 742; Papazoglou v Papazoglou, 69 AD2d 855). The financial documents sought to be produced are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elman v. ZiegfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Shandell v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Brugman v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- A. Colish, Inc. v. AbramsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Burns v. HayesNew York Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.