Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Velvin v. Kent

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 1939No. 4-5508Published

1ConcurrenceSmith, J.

It has not been made to appear that the court below was in error in finding that a majority of the qualified electors of Hempstead county voted to remove the county seat to Hope, and for that reason I concur in the holding that the judgment should be affirmed.

I do not concur in the. reasoning by which the majority have reached that conclusion. The majority say that “section 2 of act 123 of 1935 (carried into Pope’s Digest as § 4693 thereof) furnishes a.proper test to determine who are electors.” But that test was not applied. Had it been, many of the 3,169 names appearing on the collector’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williamson v. RusseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API