Legal Opinion
Namen v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided June 17, 1983No. 5662PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Judge.
William Ñamen was indicted for theft by receiving, in violation of AS 11.46.-190, AS 11.46.100(4) and AS 11.46.130(a)(1). After unsuccessfully moving to suppress evidence and dismiss his indictment, Ñamen entered a plea of nolo contendere, reserving the right to appeal from the denial of his pretrial motions. 1
On appeal, Ñamen contends that the superior court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized during a search of his home. The search was conducted pursuant to a warrant that Ñamen contends was invalid. The facts relevant to Namen’s claim may be stated…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GallegosUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. GutmanCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Commonwealth v. RutkowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- People v. AllbrittonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- State v. DallmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.