Legal Opinion
People v. Delarossa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court misadvised him concerning the immigration consequences of his plea is without merit (see CPL 220.50 [7]; cf. People v Argueta, 46 AD3d 46, 51 [2007]). The defendant’s claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to negotiate a plea to a crime that would not have constituted an “ag*560gravated felony” under federal law (8 USC § 1101 [a] [43] [B]) rests largely on matter dehors the record and, to that extent, it cannot be reviewed (see People v Madrid, 52 AD3d 532, 533 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 790 [2008]; People v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DragoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. ReelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. ArguetaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BrowningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GuzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. KuarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010