Legal Opinion

Troxel v. Thomas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1900No. 18,938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

— The relief sought to be obtained by appellees under the facts 'alleged in their complaint was the cancelation of a certain promissory note and an application of the amount of money which it represented to the payment of a certain judgment. A demurrer to the complaint for insufficiency of facts was overruled. The assignment of errors is based (1) upon the ruling of the lower court on a demurrer to the complaint; (2) sustaining the joint demurrer of appellees to the second paragraph of answer; (3) sustaining the separate demurrers of appellees to appellant’s cross-compjaint; (4) denying…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. GilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Jeffersonville Water Supply Co. v. RiterIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Abney, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Continental Insurance v. BairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Tomlinson v. BainakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. French v. National Refining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Grover v. MarottIndiana Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API