Legal Opinion
Sisk v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 20, 1964No. [No. 55, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.
This is appellant’s second attempt to offset his conviction of obtaining money by false pretenses under Code (1957), Article 27, Section 140. In his first appeal, Sisk v. State, 232 Md. 155, we held that the Regiscope photograph, which convicted him, had not been properly authenticated, and remanded for a new trial.
Although State’s Exhibit No. 1, a check, 1 was admitted into evidence over appellant’s objection, the case turns upon the admissibility, vel non, of a Regiscope photograph, State’s Exhibit No. 2, and the negative from which it was produced, State’s Exhibit No. 3A.
Appellant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. BowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. GoyetSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- State v. TatumWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co. v. State Ex Rel. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bergner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. DunnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Sun Cab Co. v. WalstonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.