Legal Opinion
Craig M. Maynard v. United States of America
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 17, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00660Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRAIG M. MAYNARD, Case No.: 22-CR-1503-TWR 25-CV-0660-TWR 12 Defendant-Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 2255
14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Plaintiff-Respondent. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendant Craig M. Maynard’s Motion to Vacate under 18
28 U.S.C. § 2255
(“Mot.,” ECF No. 355), as well as the United States of America’s 19 Response in Opposition (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 364) to the Motion. For the reasons set forth 20 below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion. 21…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Marcus T. Baumann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Deborah Jean RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- John F. Ouimette v. John Moran, Director of the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.