Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Totten

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1930No. 1 Div. 617PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

' The appeal in this ease is by the respond-. ents to a bill in equity seeking the specific performance of a contract, and the court overruled demurrer to the bill. It was filed by the owner of real estate, and the contract' was an option in his favor. The real estate was the homestead of the complainant, and' the consideration far exceeded $2,000. There is shown in the bill a valuable consideration, for the option contract.

In other words, the agreement, in short, was that complainant, as owner, should have the option tó sell to respondents the property, and thereupon the respondents would…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ross v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. SavageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Pearce v. Third Ave. Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Blackburn v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Davis v. RobertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Asbury v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Sherrill v. Alabama Appliance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Moss v. CogleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Kennedy v. HerringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API