Legal Opinion
Schureman v. State Highway Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1966No. Calendar 2, Docket 51,282PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’Iíaka, J.
The precise question, presented by this case is whether article 9, § 15, of the Michigan Constitution of 1963 applies only to general obligation bonds of this State or to its revenue bonds and special obligation bonds as well.
The involved section provides:
“Sec. 15. The State may borrow money for specific purposes in amounts as may be provided by acts of the legislature adopted by a vote of two-thirds of the members elected to and serving in each house, and approved by a majority of the electors voting thereon at any general election. The question submitted to the electors shall…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Highway Commissioner v. Detroit City ControllerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Controversy Between California Toll Bridge Authority & City & County of San Francisco v. WentworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Wilmington Medical Center, Inc. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1976 Pa 240Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1986 Pa 281Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1976 PA 295, 1976 PA 297Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.