Tenneco, Inc. v. Central New York Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term, in granting plaintiff’s motion to dismiss affirmative defenses contained in defendant’s answer, properly determined their lack of merit. Defendant’s first affirmative defense, alleging plaintiff’s lack of authority to condemn property which is being used for public purpose, cannot be sustained. It is a generally acknowledged principle that lands taken by condemnation or acquired by purchase for public use should not be taken for another public use unless the reasons therefor are special, unusual and peculiar. Nevertheless,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Railroad Commission of California v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Memphis Union Station Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1964
- County of Delaware v. Walton Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- Town of Riga v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991