Claim of Miller v. Victoria Bondholders Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
By decision dated May 20, 1964 the board affirmed the decisión of the Referee upon a finding that further causally related disability had not been established and closed the ease. No appeal was taken from this decision as provided by section 23 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. In a letter dated May 25, 1964 hddressed to the chairman of the board claimant sought a re-examination of the facts developed at the hearings which culminated in the adverse result and “ a reopening and an honest reconsideration of her case.” On June 23, 1964 the board advised the claimant that reconsideration of its…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Pressler v. I. Maner ManufacturingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Claim of De Maio v. Rockford Plumbing & HeatingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978