State v. Harris
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
Jerold Alan Harris (“defendant”) appeals his convictions for robbery with a dangerous weapon and first degree murder of Jimmy Andreson (“Andreson”). In his brief before this Court, defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that David Foreman (“Foreman”) and Tyrone Dukes (“Dukes”), his co-defendants, would not be called to testify without conducting the balancing test required by Evidence Rule 403, and in failing to conduct inquiry into hearsay statements which were excluded after the co-defendants became unavailable. Defendant argues that these…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- United States v. William J. VandettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Currence v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Phillips & Jordan Investment Corp. v. Ashblue Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. HardisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010