Capo v. State

The State charged Capo by information with a variety of drug related offenses including two counts of importation and two counts of possession of more than 100 pounds of marijuana. Based upon a jury verdict, Capo was convicted of the four noted charges and now seeks review asserting as error, among other theories, that the evidence was insufficient and that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of criminal activity with which appellant was not charged.

Since the jury found Capo guilty, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. Parrish v. State, 97 So.2d 356…