Legal Opinion
In re Patricia M.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 7, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
George L. Cobb, J.
The Mental Hygiene Legal Service has moved to dismiss the retention applications with respect to the above-named patients upon the ground that the retention applications submitted are supported by the most conclusory allegations which are neither sworn nor affirmed.
The instant applications were made pursuant to section 9.33
*829of the Mental Hygiene Law. Subdivision (b) thereof provides that the court must be satisfied that the patient requires continued retention for care and treatment prior to issuing an order authorizing such retention. When such a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Edward L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Muhlhahn v. Triple Cee Bar & Restaurant Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re StefanoNew York Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re VeressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009