Legal Opinion

North Bergen Twp. v. Luckenbach Terminals, Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 31, 1941No. Docket 130/336Published

1Opinion of the Court

This matter came before me on notice by the complainant to the defendant Luckenbach Terminals, Inc., to strike out its answer. I advised an order dated January 24th, 1941, striking out the answer from which order, I am informed, an appeal has been taken to the Court of Errors and Appeals.

The bill in this case was filed to foreclose a tax lien held by the complainant. Paragraph 1 of the answer generally denies all the averments of the bill of complaint, which violates rule No. 67 of this court. Even though the general denial of the complaint is in violation of said rule, such denial is in fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paramount Investment Corp. v. JessopSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. B.H.K. Realty Co. v. ScarletNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Luckenbach Terminals, Inc. v. Township of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  4. Luckenbach Terminals, Inc. v. N. Bergen Twp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API