Legal Opinion

Riggins v. American Express Centurion Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 8, 2005No. 3D04-2620PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Because American Express properly accelerated the defendant’s outstanding balance by filing suit while she was admittedly in default, see Delandro v. America’s Mortgage Servicing, Inc., 674 So.2d 184, 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Pici v. First Union Nat’l Bank of Fla., 621 So.2d 732, 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), review denied, 629 So.2d 132 (Fla.1993); Parise v. Citizens Nat’l Bank, 438 So.2d 1020, 1022 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Cent. Home Trust Co. of Elizabeth v. Lippincott, 392 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); see also David v. Sun Fed’l Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 461 So.2d 93, 96 (Fla.1984), the summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. David v. Sun Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Central Home Trust Co. v. LippincottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Delandro v. AMERICA'S MORTG. SERVICINGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Pici v. FIRST UNION NAT. BANK OF FLA.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Parise v. Citizens Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bader v. Meros, Smith & OlneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API