Legal Opinion

Smith v. Crescent Chevrolet Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1941No. 2222PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On May 18, 1938, the Crescent Chevrolet Company, Inc., secured a judgment against E.J. Smith for the sum of $581.28, with interest and cost, being the value of a car traded to said company by Smith on a new car, plus repairs made on this traded car by the company and attorney's fees paid by the company. It developed that the traded car had been stolen by some one and because of that fact the car was reclaimed by the real owner and taken from the customer to whom the company had sold it. This judgment against Smith was rendered by default on a citation with a return made by the deputy sheriff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurry v. HurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. Baham v. Stewart Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  3. Logwood v. LogwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Sims v. First Nat. Bank of RustonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  5. Adler v. Board of Levee Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roper v. DaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Hood Motor Company, Inc. v. LawrenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Guillory v. Reimers-Schneider CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Guedry Finance Company v. BrelandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Martinez v. SilvermanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API