Massee v. Schiller
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent · FoglemanJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I cannot understand how either the trial court or the majority of this court arrives at a result which permits or approves the action of appellees in erecting a new boundary fence south of the easement of appellants. I agree that a review of the first appeal1 in this ease is essential to an understanding of-the issue involved here. I do not agree with the majority’s analysis of facts in that case. Then, appellants sought, among other things, a decree:
1. Quieting their title against all claims of appel-lees to a 20-foot lane across the entire width of the NE¼ SE¼ of…
Also in this document: Dissent · Byrd.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Craig v. O'BRYANSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Brooks v. ReedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Nelms v. SteelhammerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Lusby v. HerndonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Massee v. SchillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964