Legal Opinion

United States v. Carl Miller

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 27, 2013No. 11-3788PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TINDER, Circuit Judge.

When Carl T. Miller pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in 2011, the government contended that three of his prior convictions qualified as “violent felonies” requiring a mandatory minimum 15-year sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Miller did not dispute that his two burglary convictions qualified as violent felonies but he objected to the third prior offense — possession of a short-barreled shotgun in violation of Wisconsin law. The objection required the district court to construe the meaning of ACCA’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chambers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. DearbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Israel Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Tyrice GloverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Robert Taylor v. Ricky HughesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. TrentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. Edwards v. Jolliff-BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API