Legal Opinion

People v. Branning

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 18, 1996No. 4-96-0144PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

In this case we pass upon the constitutionality of section 2 — 110 of the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code (Code), which states as follows:

"No recipient of services shall be subjected to electro-convulsive therapy, or to any unusual, hazardous, or experimental services or psychosurgery, without his written and informed consent.

If the recipient is a minor or is under guardianship, such recipient’s parent or guardian is authorized, only with the approval of the court, to provide informed consent for participation of the ward in any such services which the guardian deems to be…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. One 1998 GMCIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Matter of PeronaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. People v. Barbara H.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. People v. ONE 1998 GMCIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API