Legal Opinion
Mazzoni v. Village of Seneca Falls
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1806Memorandum: Plaintiff Patricia A. Mazzoni and plaintiffs Karl B. Elliott and Joanne E. Elliott each commenced an action against defendant Village of Seneca Falls (Village) and defendants Seneca County Industrial Development Agency and Finger Lakes Railway Corp. (collectively, Railroad defendants), and those actions thereafter were consolidated. Mazzoni sought, inter alia, to establish her ownership by adverse possession of certain disputed property in the Village (hereafter, Mazzoni disputed property), the largest parcel of which is “relocated Dey Street.” The Elliotts sought, inter alia, to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Walsh v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Monte v. DiMarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Harrison v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Harrison v. New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Town of Fowler v. ParowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Miller v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Town of Fowler v. ParowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016