Legal Opinion

INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE v. Engelman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 17, 1997No. 144, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

We are principally called upon in this case to review the propriety of an administrative enforcement proceeding brought under the Maryland Insurance Code (“the Code”), Maryland Code (1957, 1991 Repl.Vol., 1992 Cum.Supp.), Article 48A, §§ 1-697. 1 We are asked whether the Maryland Insurance Administration (“the MIA”) may prohibit, by adjudication, bail bondsmen from accepting installment payments on bond premiums 2 when their surety’s approved rate filings 3 neither permit nor prohibit such activity. For the reasons explained below, we shall answer that question in the negative…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Montgomery County v. BuckmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Catonsville Nursing Home, Inc. v. LovemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Giant Food, Inc. v. Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Grasslands Plantation, Inc. v. Frizz-King Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. State Highway Administration v. David A. Bramble, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Lowery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API