Legal Opinion

Cridlebaugh v. Rudolph

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 8, 1941No. Civil Action No. 54Published

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

This suit involves Patent No. 19,562, reissued May 7, 1935, to Jacob Jones, and Letters Patent No. 2,079,107, issued May 4, 1937, to John Clayton Cridlebaugh for an alleged improvement upon the Jones invention, which are now owned by the plaintiff Cridlebaugh, and defendant’s patent No. 2,181,070, issued November 21, 1939.

Each of the inventions covered by the respective patents relates to a mask or blinders adapted to be secured upon the beak of a fowl, for the purpose of preventing it picking the feathers or flesh of another. It is well known in the poultry business…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Louisville Frog, Switch & Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API