Loomis v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Motion on behalf of the defendant in the action above entitled for an order requiring the plaintiffs to amend the complaint by separately stating and numbering the causes of action 'contained in the second cause of action alleged therein.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
The plaintiffs allege for their second cause of action, in brief, that they tendered to the defendant certain shipments of grain, produce, vegetables and fruits in ear lots for transportation to various points upon its own and connecting lines; that defendant supplied for such shipments ordinary box cars, and that they were compelled, in order to load the cars either to minimum or maximum capacity, to equip said cars with inside or grain doors or bulkheads at an expense of eighty-seven dollars and sixty-eight cents.
It does not appear from the complaint, strictly speaking, that there is more…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Loomis v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Loomis v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Langdon v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891