Burruss, Son & Co. v. Trant & Bro.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from decree of hustings court of city of Portsmouth, rendered April 25th, 1890, in a suit wherein the appellant, the firm of Burruss, Son & Co., was plaintiff, and the firm of Trant & Bro. was defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtFatjntleroy, J.
On the 8th day of March, 1890, ÍT. Burruss, doing business as Burruss, Son & Co., sued out of the clerk’s office of the court of hustings for the city of Portsmouth, an attachment against George R. Trant and J. B. Trant, doing business as Trant & Bro., which attachment was sued out in *981an action of debt instituted the same day by the said plaintiff against the said defendant, and was duly levied on certain real and personal property of the said Trant & Brother, as appears by the return on said attachment. In the affidavit for the said attachment the sole ground alleged is that “ the said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sublett & Cary v. WoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunn v. Claunch, Gilliland and DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Kinnie v. KinnieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Lancaster v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
- Lancaster v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
- Lancaster v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876