Legal Opinion
Moore v. Moore
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 7, 1950No. 3888PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.
The authenticated copy of the Georgia judgment was properly received in evidence. Its correctness was certified by the clerk of the court. The fact of his being clerk, the genuineness of his signature and the fact that the seal affixed was the seal of the court were certified by the Presiding Judge of the court. Finally, the fact that the Presiding Judge was such and the genuineness of his signature were certified by the clerk. State v. Blaisdell, 59 N. H. 328.
When a judgment is final in the sense that it is not subject to modification in the discretion of the court that rendered it as to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Fischer v. FischerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Varble v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Glaze v. StrengthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Griffin v. AverySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Sperl v. SperlSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Nickas v. NickasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- State v. RooneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975