Legal Opinion

People v. Cunningham

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1996No. Docket 170163PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWahls, J.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b; MSA 28.788(2). He was acquitted of three other counts of criminal sexual conduct. Defendant appeals as of right. We reverse.

The complainant, who was from Thailand, testified at trial through an interpreter. She testified that defendant raped her five or six times. Defendant testified that his sexual encounters with the complainant were consensual.

On appeal, defendant argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the interpreter interfered with his right to cross-examination. We agree. Defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. HaywoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State, in Interest of RrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. People v. StarlingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. People v. MinorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Vasquez v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. People v. McPhersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. HoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. TruongMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API