Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of New London, No. 93-525446s (Aug. 29, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 29, 1997No. 93-525446SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (NO. 244),DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (NO. 254) AND THE THIRD-PARTYPLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (NO. 229) Pursuant to Practice Book § 378, the plaintiff, the defendants, and the third-party defendants have moved for summary judgment. This memorandum of decision will address the three motions as follows. Part III will address the defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff. Part IV will address the plaintiff's…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ferryman v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API