Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. Railroad Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
The only issue involved in this case is whether or not the Railroad Commission had jurisdiction to make the order reviewed. The trial court was of the opinion that under the case of Cawker v. Meyer, 147 Wis. 320, 133 N. W. 157, the plaintiffs here were not a public utility and that the Railroad Commission had no jurisdiction. The court said:
“The plaintiffs are in no sense a public utility. They are only a group of neighbors who have co-operated to build a line to supply themselves with electric current, with no purpose of making a profit or of serving the public generally or any portion of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Cawker v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Payne v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Inland Empire Rural Electrification, Inc. v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Rural Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Wisconsin Traction, Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.