Legal Opinion
Gold v. Killeen
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1934No. Civil No. 3295PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.
This is an action by A. M. Cold against the executrices of the estate of Martin Cold to recover for services rendered the latter during his lifetime. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend and judgment for the defendants followed. From it the plaintiff has appealed.
The correctness of the ruling sustaining the demurrer can be determined only by examining the allegations of the complaint. It appears from them that in November, 1894, the plaintiff, A. M. Cold, at the request of Martin Cold, deceased, left his home in Povlje, Austria, and arrived in Phoenix,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Heery v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Hagan v. McNaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Schoonover v. VachonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Lane v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Annon v. LucasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
- Simpson v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Evans v. MasonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.