Riggs v. Capital Brick Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
In Equity. Suits to foreclose mortgages.
1Opinion of the Court
PRATT, District Judge.
The same question arises.in each case,, and a brief statement of the facts in the first named will disclose its. nature.
The plaintiffs are the receivers of the Republic Savings & Loan Association, a corporation organized under the laws of New York,, and now insolvent. The Capital Brick Company, a Connecticut corporation located at Hartford, borrowed $3,500 of the New York corporation. The shareholders of the insolvent corporation were divided into borrowers and nonborrowers. To obtain a loan, it was necessary to subscribe for such a number of shares as at their par value…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strohen v. Franklin Saving Fund & Loan Ass'n ex rel. McKinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Curtis v. Granite State Provident Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Hall v. StowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Riggs v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Breed v. . RuoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Phœnix v. Arizona Mut. Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915