Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Capital Brick Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided March 2, 1904No. Nos. 1,132, 1,133PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suits to foreclose mortgages.

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge.

The same question arises.in each case,, and a brief statement of the facts in the first named will disclose its. nature.

The plaintiffs are the receivers of the Republic Savings & Loan Association, a corporation organized under the laws of New York,, and now insolvent. The Capital Brick Company, a Connecticut corporation located at Hartford, borrowed $3,500 of the New York corporation. The shareholders of the insolvent corporation were divided into borrowers and nonborrowers. To obtain a loan, it was necessary to subscribe for such a number of shares as at their par value…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strohen v. Franklin Saving Fund & Loan Ass'n ex rel. McKinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  2. Curtis v. Granite State Provident Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  3. Hall v. StowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Riggs v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Breed v. . RuoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Phœnix v. Arizona Mut. Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API